# Orca vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 109 581 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 674 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 674 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-qwc2