# Orca vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 109 264 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 357 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-qm-music