# Orca vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 108 958 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 051 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 051 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-qfieldcloud