# Orca vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 108 815 ✓ | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 908 ✓ | +229 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.

Orca is growing faster right now (+8 908 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-pulse