# Orca vs PhotoMigrator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | PhotoMigrator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 109 676 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 769 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Orca.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; PhotoMigrator needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 769 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-photomigrator