# OrcaQ vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OrcaQ | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 225 | 91 931 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +490 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.1.14 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 49/100 for OrcaQ, so it is the safer default.

OrcaQ ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, OrcaQ is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+490 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OrcaQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca-q) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca-q.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-q-vs-paddleocr