# OpsiMate vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpsiMate | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 284 | 93 040 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 246 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.0.123 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 46/100 for OpsiMate, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpsiMate.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpsiMate](https://selfhost.directory/project/opsimate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opsimate.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opsimate-vs-uptime-kuma