# OpsiMate vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpsiMate | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 285 | 95 336 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 374 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.0.123 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 46/100 for OpsiMate, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpsiMate.

If you want the quickest setup, OpsiMate is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 374 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpsiMate](https://selfhost.directory/project/opsimate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opsimate.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opsimate-vs-stirling-pdf