# operately vs pneumaticworkflow

> Two self-hosted [Monday.com alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/mondaycom), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | operately | pneumaticworkflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 45 in Project Management | #19 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 603 ✓ | 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.10.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.3.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

operately scores 55/100 against 48/100 for pneumaticworkflow, so it is the safer default.

pneumaticworkflow ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for operately.

If you want the quickest setup, operately is easier to run; pneumaticworkflow needs more configuration.

operately is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [operately](https://selfhost.directory/project/operately) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operately.md)
- [pneumaticworkflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/pneumaticworkflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pneumaticworkflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/operately-vs-pneumaticworkflow