# Operant vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Operant | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #169 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 446 | 15 376 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +44 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Operant](https://selfhost.directory/project/operant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operant.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/operant-vs-peertube