OpenWrtvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 28 965 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +462 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+462 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with