# OpenWrt vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWrt | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +464 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWrt](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwrt-vs-wildbox