OpenWrtvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 | 39 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +454 | +763 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 83/100 for OpenWrt, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with