# OpenWrt vs txtdot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWrt | txtdot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +464 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.

OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for txtdot.

If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.

OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWrt](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt.md)
- [txtdot](https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwrt-vs-txtdot