OpenWrtvstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 28 975 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +462 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+462 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →textsnap details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with