# OpenWrt vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWrt | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +464 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.

OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWrt](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwrt-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana