# OpenWrt vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWrt | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 28 971 ✓ | 10 437 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +458 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.

OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+458 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWrt](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwrt.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwrt-vs-polar