# openwhisk vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openwhisk | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 89 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +2 430 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwhisk-vs-world-monitor