# openwhisk vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openwhisk | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +153 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openwhisk scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwhisk-vs-workout-cool