# openwhisk vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openwhisk | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 93 035 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Scala | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwhisk-vs-uptime-kuma