# openwhisk vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openwhisk | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Scala | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.

openwhisk is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwhisk-vs-upptime