openwhiskvsSurrealDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openwhisk | SurrealDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #5 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 33 240 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +182 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 |
| Latest release | — | v3.3.4 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Scala | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SurrealDB scores 78/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.
SurrealDB ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.
If you want the quickest setup, SurrealDB is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.
SurrealDB is growing faster right now (+182 stars in 30 days).
openwhisk details →SurrealDB details →
Swap a project
Keep openwhisk, compare it with
Keep SurrealDB, compare it with