# openwhisk vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openwhisk | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 61 531 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +487 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Scala | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+487 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwhisk-vs-pi-hole