# OpenWA vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWA | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in API Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 343 | 95 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 | +2 339 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 77/100 for OpenWA, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWA](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwa-vs-stirling-pdf