# OpenWA vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWA | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in API Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 16 333 | 35 784 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +327 | +859 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 77/100 for OpenWA, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+859 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWA](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwa-vs-seaweedfs