# OpenWA vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenWA | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in API Management | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 16 343 ✓ | 2 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenWA scores 77/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.

rsyslog ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

OpenWA is growing faster right now (+337 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenWA](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwa.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openwa-vs-rsyslog