# openvox vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openvox | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 55/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 1 019 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 9.2.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Scada-LTS scores 55/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.

openvox ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.

## Details

- [openvox](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openvox-vs-scada-lts