# OpenTTD vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenTTD | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in Gaming | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 436 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 ✓ | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 73/100 for OpenTTD, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for OpenTTD.

## Details

- [OpenTTD](https://selfhost.directory/project/openttd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openttd.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openttd-vs-srs