OpenTTDvsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenTTD | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in Gaming | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 8 435 | 28 917 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +403 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 5 |
| Latest release | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 73/100 for OpenTTD, so it is the safer default.
Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for OpenTTD.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; OpenTTD needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+403 stars in 30 days).
OpenTTD details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenTTD, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with