OpenTakeoffvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenTakeoff | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 45 in Project Management | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 714 | 15 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 13 |
| Latest release | mcp-v0.9.100 · 25 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 56/100 for OpenTakeoff, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for OpenTakeoff.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenTakeoff is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
OpenTakeoff details →PeerTube details →