# OpenStreetMap vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenStreetMap | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 869 | 12 825 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 66/100 for OpenStreetMap, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.

OpenStreetMap is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenStreetMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openstreetmap-vs-zookeeper