# OpenStreetMap vs ulogger-server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenStreetMap | ulogger-server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #6 of 6 in Location Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 2 868 ✓ | 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenStreetMap scores 66/100 against 50/100 for ulogger-server, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ulogger-server is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.

OpenStreetMap is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenStreetMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap.md)
- [ulogger-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/ulogger-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ulogger-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openstreetmap-vs-ulogger-server