OpenStreetMapvsrestic-rest-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | restic-rest-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 2 867 | 1 531 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenStreetMap scores 66/100 against 60/100 for restic-rest-server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, restic-rest-server is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.
OpenStreetMap details →restic-rest-server details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep restic-rest-server, compare it with