OpenStreetMapvsRedash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | Redash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 2 868 | 28 851 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 66/100 for OpenStreetMap, so it is the safer default.
Redash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.
If you want the quickest setup, Redash is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.
OpenStreetMap details →Redash details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep Redash, compare it with