# OpenStreetMap vs portabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenStreetMap | portabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 867 ✓ | 1 860 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +95 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 64 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.35.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenStreetMap scores 66/100 against 60/100 for portabase, so it is the safer default.

portabase ships more often: 64 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.

If you want the quickest setup, portabase is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.

portabase is growing faster right now (+95 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenStreetMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap.md)
- [portabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portabase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openstreetmap-vs-portabase