OpenStreetMapvsphoton-docker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | photon-docker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #5 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 2 868 | 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenStreetMap scores 66/100 against 48/100 for photon-docker, so it is the safer default.
photon-docker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.
If you want the quickest setup, photon-docker is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.
OpenStreetMap is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenStreetMap details →photon-docker details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep photon-docker, compare it with