# OpenStreetMap vs OpenTripPlanner

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenStreetMap | OpenTripPlanner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #4 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 2 867 ✓ | 2 766 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.10.0 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenStreetMap scores 66/100 against 64/100 for OpenTripPlanner, so it is the safer default.

OpenTripPlanner ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.

## Details

- [OpenStreetMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstreetmap.md)
- [OpenTripPlanner](https://selfhost.directory/project/opentripplanner) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opentripplanner.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openstreetmap-vs-opentripplanner