# openstatus vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openstatus | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Status Pages | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 9 240 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

openstatus and Upptime score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.

openstatus is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openstatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openstatus-vs-upptime