# openstatus vs paperclip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openstatus | paperclip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Status Pages | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 9 241 | 108 301 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 | +26 937 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 69/100 for openstatus, so it is the safer default.

paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openstatus.

If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 937 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openstatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openstatus.md)
- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openstatus-vs-paperclip