openstatusvspaperclip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openstatus | paperclip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Status Pages | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 9 241 | 108 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 | +26 937 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 69/100 for openstatus, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openstatus.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 937 stars in 30 days).
openstatus details →paperclip details →
Swap a project
Keep openstatus, compare it with
Keep paperclip, compare it with