# Openship vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Openship | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in PaaS | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 14 978 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.18.27 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Openship scores 67/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

Openship ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Openship needs more configuration.

Openship is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Openship](https://selfhost.directory/project/openship) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openship.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openship-vs-wbo