OpenshipvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Openship | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in PaaS | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 14 972 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +102 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Openship scores 67/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
Openship ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Openship needs more configuration.
Openship is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).
Openship details →WBO details →