# Openship vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Openship | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in PaaS | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 14 975 | 93 040 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +105 | +1 246 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 67/100 for Openship, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Openship.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Openship needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Openship](https://selfhost.directory/project/openship) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openship.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openship-vs-uptime-kuma