# Openship vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Openship | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in PaaS | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 974 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for Openship, so it is the safer default.

Openship ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Openship needs more configuration.

Openship is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Openship](https://selfhost.directory/project/openship) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openship.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openship-vs-upptime