OpenshipvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Openship | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in PaaS | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 972 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +102 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for Openship, so it is the safer default.
Openship ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Openship needs more configuration.
Openship is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).
Openship details →Upptime details →