# openseo vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openseo | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 25 486 ✓ | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 899 ✓ | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 31 |
| Latest release | v0.1.19 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 72/100 for openseo, so it is the safer default.

openseo ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; openseo needs more configuration.

openseo is growing faster right now (+4 899 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openseo](https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openseo-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap