# openseo vs Whirl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openseo | Whirl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 25 524 ✓ | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 584 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.1.19 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openseo scores 72/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.

openseo ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.

If you want the quickest setup, openseo is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.

openseo is growing faster right now (+4 584 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openseo](https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo.md)
- [Whirl](https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openseo-vs-whirl