# openseo vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openseo | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 25 524 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 937 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.1.19 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openseo scores 72/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

openseo ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; openseo needs more configuration.

openseo is growing faster right now (+4 937 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openseo](https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openseo-vs-url-to-png