# openseo vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openseo | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 597 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 657 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.1.20 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

openseo scores 72/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

openseo ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.

If you want the quickest setup, openseo is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

openseo is growing faster right now (+4 657 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openseo](https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openseo-vs-typetype