# openseo vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openseo | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 577 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 637 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.1.20 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

openseo and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

openseo ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, openseo is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

openseo is growing faster right now (+4 637 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openseo](https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openseo.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openseo-vs-tube-archivist